SCIESCOPUSQ1
Research Synthesis Methods
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, United Kingdom
Research Synthesis Methods is an academic journal published by CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS (United Kingdom). Identifiers: ISSN 1759-2879, eISSN 1759-2887. Indexed in SCIE, SCOPUS. Metrics: JIF 6.1, CiteScore 17.5, SJR 4.020, SNIP 4.07. Subject areas: MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES. tlooto lists 946 papers from this journal.
CiteScore
17.50
Scopus citation metric
SJR
4.020
SCImago rank
SNIP
4.07
Source normalized impact
Percentage rank
-
JIF percentile rank
Journal profile
- ISSN
- 1759-2879
- eISSN
- 1759-2887
- Abbreviation
- RES SYNTH METHODS
- Publisher
- CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
- Country
- United Kingdom
Web of Science categories
SCIEMATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Scopus ASJC categories
3304 Education
Keywords
Mathematical & Computational Biology | Multidisciplinary Sciences
Papers in this journal
Recent papers
- Transforming evidence synthesis: A systematic review of the evolution of automated meta-analysis in the age of AI
2026 · 1 citations
- What level of automation is “good enough”? A benchmark of large language models for meta-analysis data extraction
2026
- A novel approach for visualizing local consistency in network meta-analysis.
2026
- Large language model-based paper classification framework with key-insight extraction and confidence-weighted voting.
2026
- Facilitators and barriers to engaging patient partners in knowledge syntheses: A stage-based approach.
2026
Most cited papers
- A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis
2010 · 6,127 citations
- Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments
2020 · 4,540 citations
- A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
2014 · 2,666 citations
- Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta‐analysis
2010 · 2,456 citations
- Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources
2020 · 1,952 citations