Philosophers at the throne: the intellectual genealogy of American national conservatism

This work aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of national conservatism as an intellectual and political movement that emerged in opposition to liberalism and now plays a significant role in the transformation of the American political landscape. Drawing methodologically on the general theory of scientific and intellectual movements (developing Thomas Kuhn’s approach) and on the concept of intellectual genealogy (in the form of Michel Foucault’s discursive organization of practice), the study traces the development of national conservatism through an analysis of the discourse produced by its representatives. National conservatism has consolidated a broad network of intellectuals of various persuasions—nationalists, post-liberals, federal reformers, and constitutionalists. This coalition, possessing a significant institutional infrastructure, has achieved considerable success, influencing not only public debate but also concrete political processes. The right-wing revolution of national conservatives has several key aspects. First, it is a struggle against the hegemony of liberal globalism, associated with a unipolar world order known as Fukuyama’s end of history. Second, it is a break with the fusionist status quo and outdated forms of conservatism, which is referred to as “defusionism.” Third, national conservatives are initiating a fundamental reform of political and bureaucratic institutions, including the abolition of elements of the “deep state,” considered dead and counterproductive. National conservatives’ primary interest is focused on regime change—a process they have already largely succeeded in initiating by shaking the existing status quo. The electoral success of national conservatives poses new challenges for the conservative revolution. Beyond preserving the existing coalition, a key focus remains ensuring the victory of candidates like J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio in the 2028 U.S. presidential election. Alongside maintaining political power, there is a need to move from abstract ideological discussions to concrete actions aimed at supporting the family and promoting the national good, as interpreted by the Natcons and based on the principle of prudence. Thus, national conservatism not only opposes the predominant form of liberalism but also actively promotes systemic reforms and a rethinking of the institutional structures (foundations) of the modern state.