G. Van Den Abbeele
2026.6.18Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia
Abstract
The article explores the conceptual tensions between Jacques Derrida and Jean François Lyotard regarding the nature and critical function of difference. While Derrida develops différance and the notion of the trace as forces that undermine the metaphysics of presence within linguistic structures, Lyotard introduces the distinction between discourse and figure to highlight what eludes linguistic rationality. In Discourse, Figure, Lyotard argues that Western metaphysics reduces experience to textuality, repressing the sensuous, affective dimension of meaning. Figure names this non discursive, aesthetic, bodily dimension that resists conceptualization and disrupts structured discourse. The text also examines three moments when Lyotard explicitly critiques Derrida, especially around the status of the sign, the trace, and Husserl’s phenomenology. Despite the absence of an actual polemic, both thinkers intersect—particularly through questions of designation, deixis, and the limits of language. Their implicit dialogue reveals two distinct yet convergent attempts to rethink how difference operates beyond systems of identity.
Citation format
ABBEELE, G. Van Den. Go figure! Thinking difference differently: Jean-françois lyotard and jacques derrida. Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia, 2026, 76: 13–28.