Medicine

Marissa Berry, Radhika Pandit, Devra D Doan Mast, Skyler Montaine O'Brien, Kara M. Rood

2026.6.2AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY

DOI: 10.1055/a-2881-9341

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to assess patient experiences, priorities, and satisfaction with management of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) requiring treatment beyond oxytocin.

Study Design We conducted a cross-sectional survey (January-April 2024) of postpartum individuals (≥37 weeks, aged 18-50) who experienced abnormal bleeding treated beyond first-line oxytocin at a tertiary academic center. Outcomes included patient priorities, treatment experiences, and satisfaction with decision-making.

Results Of 428 screened patients, 142 met inclusion and 100 consented. Most received uterotonics (92%); 26% antifibrinolytics; 9% intrauterine vacuum device; 1% surgical intervention. Compared with uterotonics alone, device users had higher blood loss (1,755 vs. 516 mL, p < 0.001), more transfusions (33.3 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.01), and more surgical interventions (11.1 vs. 0%, p < 0.01). Patient priorities (minimizing blood loss, avoiding transfusion, optimizing recovery) were consistent across groups. Dissatisfaction with treatment (5.4%) and clinician communication (15.1%) occurred only among those treated with uterotonics.

Conclusion Patients valued minimizing morbidity and optimizing recovery, with overall high satisfaction, but communication gaps remain. These findings highlight the need for patient-centered strategies in PPH care and future trials comparing pharmacological versus mechanical second-line options.

Key Points · Patients value minimizing morbidity despite management approach.. · Patients value provider communication with complications.. · Assessing patient priorities guides patient-centered approaches..

Citation format

BERRY, Marissa, et al. Patient priorities and experiences in the management of abnormal postpartum bleeding. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2026.