International Relations and Foreign PolicyPolitical Conflict and GovernanceEconomic Sanctions and International Relations

Michael A. Goldfien, Michael F. Joseph, R. McManus

2026.6.8AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW

DOI: 10.1017/s0003055426101713

Abstract

How do states overcome mistrust? Scholars argue that costly foreign policy signals build trust. But when trust is low, such as during rivalries, states are unwilling to use these signals for fear of being cheated. We argue that domestic policies can also build trust by revealing information about a state’s likelihood of cooperating internationally when there is a correlation between domestic and international preferences. We further argue that domestic policies have a distinct advantage: the value states accrue from them depends less on international reciprocation. As a result, domestic choices can reassure counterparts at moments when trust is so low that costly international signals appear prohibitively risky. We test the implications of our theory in case studies of the Cold War’s end and United States–South Korea trust-building post-coup, illuminating several phenomena the current literature struggles to explain: initial trust-building between enduring rivals, asymmetric trust-building, and trust-building through illiberal domestic policies.

Citation format

GOLDFIEN, Michael A.; JOSEPH, Michael F.; MCMANUS, R. The domestic sources of international trust. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2026: 1–19.