N. Kozyavkina, I. Popovych, D. Popovych, T. Voloshyn, W. Zukow
Abstract
Background. In a previous study in line with the tensioregulome concept, we found that, firstly, the correlation between changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) under the influence of balneotherapy is only of moderate strength; secondly, the correlations between changes in both components of BP, on the one hand, and heart rate variability (HRV) markers of both sympathetic and vagal tones, on the other hand, are on the verge of significance or even insignificant. We assumed that the directionality and severity of the autonomic nervous system influence on BP are determined by concomitant changes in the constellation of parameters of the neuro-endocrine-immune complex and metabolism, and can be predicted by the same or a different combination. The purpose of this study is to test these hypotheses. Materials and methods. Under observation, there were 44 patients with chronic pyelonephritis and cholecystitis in the phase of remission. Testing was performed twice — on admission and after 7–10 days of standard balneotherapy on the Truskavets Spa. The objects of the study were BP and HRV, electroencephalographic, endocrine, immune, and metabolic variables. Results. In the first stage of analysis, the information field of seemingly chaotic (r = 0.25) sympathetic tone/BP diastolic relationships was fragmented into three clusters. The first cluster (n = 16; 36.3 %) demonstrated a classic direct relationship (r = +0.91): changes in sympathetic tone (LFnu) from –17 to +14 % were associated with changes in diastolic BP from –13 to +22 mmHg. The second cluster (n = 19; 43.1 %) showed areactivity (r = 0.24): despite significant fluctuations in sympathetic tone (from –44 to +46 %), diastolic BP remained relatively stable (changes from –4 to +8 mmHg). The third cluster (n = 9; 20.5 %) revealed a paradoxical inverse relationship: changes in sympathetic tone from –19 to +10 % were closely and inverse (r = –0.91) associated with changes in diastolic BP from +17 to –7 mmHg. Discriminant analysis identified 24 concomitant variables (Wilks’ = 0.025; F = 3.48; p < 10–5) and 24 predictors (Wilks’ = 0.019; F = 4.70; p < 10–6) that differentiate these clusters. Classification accuracy reached 97.7 % (100 % for paradoxical cluster). The paradoxical response of BP to changes in LFnu was accompanied by the same inverse correlation with changes in serum IgM (r = –0.85), intensity of E.coli phagocytosis by neutrophils (r = –0.72), serum catalase activity (r = –0.68) and uricosuria (r = –0.61), but with a positive correlation with changes in the amplitude of the -rhythm (r = 0.75) and its spectral power density (SPD) in loci F7 (r = 0.74), C4 (r = 0.71) and P4 (r = 0.70), as well as in the SPD of the -rhythm in locus F7 (r = 0.73) and -rhythm in locus F8 (r = 0.70). The paradoxical reaction was predicted by elevated baseline sympathetic tone (markers: LFnu and LF/HF), decreased vagal tone (marker: HF); increased systolic BP response to brachial artery occlusion during BP registration (markers: Ps3/Ps1 and Ps2/Ps1 ratio); normal basal levels of catalase and calcitonin; reduced basal levels of SPD entropy in loci F3 and C3, as well as SPD of the -rhythm in loci F3 and C4 and -rhythm in loci F8 and T4. Conclusions. The study demonstrates that the apparent weak correlation between sympathetic tone and diastolic BP at the population level masks three qualitatively distinct response patterns, including a paradoxical inverse relationship in 20.5 % of patients. This paradoxical reaction is associated with specific neuro-endocrine-immuno-metabolic profiles and can be predicted with high accuracy (97.7 %) using baseline parameters. The findings challenge the universality of the classical paradigm of sympathetic BP regulation and provide a scientific basis for personalized approaches to cardiovascular assessment and therapy in balneological practice.
Citation format
KOZYAVKINA, N., et al. Three options for the influence of sympathetic tone on diastolic blood pressure and their companions and predictors. International Neurological Journal (Ukraine), 2026, 22(1): 13–34.