Religion, Ecology, and EthicsEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsMedieval and Classical Philosophy

Moh. Isom Mudin, Nur Hadi Ihsan, Nabila Huringiin

2026.4.13Australian Journal of Islamic Studies

DOI: 10.55831/ajis.v11i3.1057

Abstract

The escalating environmental crisis underscores the inadequacy of purely technical solutions, necessitating a fundamental reorientation of humanity’s relationship with nature. This article examines two transformative approaches to this challenge. It first considers Arne Naess’ Deep Ecology, whose method of Deep Questioning effectively repositions humanity within the broader ecological community and establishes a philosophical basis for biocentric equality and the Ecological Self. Naess’ principal achievement lies in developing an inclusive framework that fosters ecological solidarity across diverse traditions. However, the movement’s philosophical openness—its chief strength—simultaneously presents its central limitation: the absence of a definitive metaphysical foundation capable of sustaining long-term environmental commitment. The study, therefore, turns to Bediüzzaman Said Nursi's tawhidic ecology, arguing that its core practice of tafakkur īmānī (contemplation of faith) complements and enhances the Deep Ecology project rather than supplanting it. Grounded in tawḥīd taḥqīqī (verified monotheism) and naẓar ḥarfī (interpreting creation as Divine signification), Nursi’s framework re-conceives the biosphere as a manifestation of Divine Names (tajalliyāt al-asmā’ al-ḥusnā). The resultant synthesis preserves the horizontal-immanent strengths of Naess’ approach while augmenting it with a vertical-transcendent epistemology, thus forging a comprehensive environmental philosophy.

Citation format

MUDIN, Moh. Isom; IHSAN, Nur Hadi; HURINGIIN, Nabila. Fortifying the deep ecology platform. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 2026, 11(3): e101.