Work-Family Balance ChallengesEmotional Labor in ProfessionsHigher Education and Employability

Jūratė Čingienė, Elena Doldor, R. Briner

2026.5.1JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2026.104249

Abstract

This paper advances the understanding of work–nonwork boundaries as a dynamic process shaped by evolving career demands, within the high-intensity context of professional service firms. While much of the mainstream work-nonwork literature conceptualises boundaries as stable preferences, recent work-life research and COVID-19 studies highlight that individuals' approaches to boundary management can shift in response to changing work, life, and health circumstances. This study explores how consulting professionals experience and (re)establish boundaries between work and nonwork throughout their careers. Employing an inductive qualitative approach, we gathered diary and interview data with thirty consultants from UK-based global firms. Findings reveal evolving boundary management modalities: idealising blurred boundaries, disillusionment, and pursuing more sustainable boundary strategies. Our insights extend boundary scholarship by illustrating the long-term dynamic negotiation of work–nonwork boundaries within the norms of professional service firms, underscoring the importance of context in shaping boundary evolution over time.

Citation format

ČINGIENĖ, Jūratė; DOLDOR, Elena; BRINER, R. Shifting approaches to blurred work-nonwork boundaries. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2026, 168: 104249.