The Scalp as a Donor Site in Pediatric Burns: Systematic Review of the Literature and Proposal of a Management Algorithm

Highlights What are the main findings? Scalp is an optimal donor site, and it is widely used in pediatric burns. Evidence points out scalp as safe and effective for STSG in pediatric patients. What are the implications of the main findings? A management algorithm improves clinical practice and elevates standard of care. Abstract Background: Deep burns in pediatric population often require split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) and the identification of an optimal donor site is crucial to minimize morbidity, accelerate healing and reduce short- and long-term complications. The scalp appears to be increasingly used in clinical practice, but evidence remains limited, despite the promise of novel bioengineering and regenerative approaches. Methods: A systematic review about the use of scalp for STSG in pediatrics was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane (2005–2025). Clinical outcomes considered were donor-site healing time, early and late complications, perioperative practices, and quality of scars. Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 417, mean age 2.9–7.3 years) with follow-up periods up to 27 years. Epithelialization occurred between 7 and 25 days. Early complications included folliculitis (up to 44% in certain hair types) and delayed healing (n = 13; 52%). A rigorous harvesting technique is needed to avoid preventable complications. Late sequelae included alopecia (1.6% to 33%—the latter largely unperceived by patients) and hypertrophic scarring (1.6–4%). Scar quality was rated good in >80% of cases. Conclusions: Evidence supports the scalp as a safe, efficient, and cosmetically favorable donor site for pediatric STSG. Based on evidence and clinical experience, we propose the first structured scalp-donor management algorithm to optimize safety, reduce complications, and standardize perioperative care in the management of pediatric burns.