Counseling Practices and SupervisionCommunity Health and DevelopmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Elizabeth M. Vera, S. Speight

2026.5.7COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST

DOI: 10.1177/00110000261447255

Abstract

Twenty-six social justice scholars evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of counseling psychology’s contributions to social justice over the past 20 years. Using a Delphi method, they made predictions about the future of social justice in counseling psychology. Strengths included influencing the field of psychology to adopt social justice values and ethics; emphasizing structural influences on well-being; elevating voices of diverse scholars; expanding practice skills to include advocacy; and adopting liberatory practice frameworks. Weaknesses included politicizing social justice dialogue; taking too few risks; omitting international perspectives; being too self-reflexive; failing to work across disciplines; allowing social justice to be jargonized; not fully modifying training models; and allowing social justice to replace traditional content areas. Predictions were a mix of positive expectations (e.g., continuing to push the American Psychological Association [APA] to change training models, participating in more advocacy and activism) and pessimistic visions (e.g., political resistance). Implications for training and leadership are discussed.

Citation format

VERA, Elizabeth M.; SPEIGHT, S. The future of social justice in counseling psychology: A delphi study. COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 2026, 54(4): 643–670.