AI in Service InteractionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

Intesar Almugren, Abhishek Bhushan Singhal, Rekha Attri, Gábor Szabó-Szentgróti, Armando Papa

2026.1.29Journal of Global Information Management

DOI: 10.4018/jgim.400249

tlooto Summary

Cluster analysis groups drivers into pedagogical, organisational, and infrastructural clusters, suggesting a phased response: begin with training and transparent policy, then invest in tools and assessments.

Abstract

Generative AI can enhance venture creation education, yet faculty adoption remains limited. This study explores why through a three-stage mixed-methods approach. Stage 1 reviewed 2020–25 literature to identify 23 barriers across pedagogical, technical, institutional, and ethical domains. Stage 2 involved interviews with experienced entrepreneurship educators, refining and reducing the list to 15 context-specific challenges. Stage 3 used a fuzzy-DEMATEL survey to capture expert causal judgments, while thematic coding of interviews added narrative depth. The resulting influence map highlights a clear hierarchy: lack of staff training, unclear governance, and weak technical support are key upstream barriers, while concerns like plagiarism and over-reliance are downstream effects. Cluster analysis groups drivers into pedagogical, organisational, and infrastructural clusters, suggesting a phased response: begin with training and transparent policy, then invest in tools and assessments.

Citation format

ALMUGREN, Intesar, et al. Perceived barriers of gen AI integration in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Global Information Management, 2026, 34(1): 1–33.