Shahab Sharfaei, Nopadol Rompho
2026.2.4JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS
tlooto Summary
The reviewed studies indicate that, contrary to popular belief, AI use does not hurt workers, including the low‐skilled, and the ease of using these technologies makes them complimentary to the low‐skilled workforce, enabling them to reach productivity levels closer to those of high skilled workers.
Abstract
This paper investigates the labor market effects of the two most disruptive technologies of the past decade–industrial robots and artificial intelligence (AI). By reviewing the empirical literature and discussing existing models, we explore how these technologies affect workers based on their level of skills. The reviewed studies indicate that, contrary to popular belief, AI use does not hurt workers, including the low‐skilled. On the contrary, the ease of using these technologies, particularly the more recent iterations of AI and large language models (LLMs), makes them complimentary to the low‐skilled workforce, enabling them to reach productivity levels closer to those of high skilled workers. This implies that the concerns about systemic AI‐driven job displacements are not strongly supported by the recently emergent empirical evidence.
Citation format
SHARFAEI, Shahab; ROMPHO, Nopadol. Automation as an equalizer: How easy‐to‐use technologies narrow skill gaps between low‐ and high‐skilled workers. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2026.