Philosophical Ethics and TheoryEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsEmotions and Moral Behavior

Mauro Rossi, Christine Tappolet

2026.2.5PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH

DOI: 10.1111/phpr.70093

Abstract

We are valuing beings, beings who possess the capacity to value things. But what is it “to value” something? The most common accounts in the literature hold that to value an item is either to have a first‐order or a second‐order desire toward it; or to believe that item to be valuable; or to care about that item; or to have a combination of all these mental states. In our paper, we raise some objections against all these accounts and defend a new affective account of valuings. Unlike standard affective accounts, according to which the term “valuing” refers to a single type of affective state, such as care, we hold that “valuing” refers to the members of a class of affective states, namely, the class of sentiments. On our view, to value something is to have a particular sentiment toward it. Since sentiments can be of different types, our account implies that there are as many ways of valuing things as there are types of sentiments.

Citation format

ROSSI, Mauro; TAPPOLET, Christine. Valuings as sentiments. PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2026, 112(2): 471–483.