Surgical site infection preventionInfectious Aortic and Vascular ConditionsAortic aneurysm repair treatments

T. Bakhishev, R. Vinogradov, A. Zakeryaev, S. Butaev, A. Sozaev, V. P. Derbilova, V.Yu. Ivashchuk, M. Pchegatluk, A. Baryshev, V. Porkhanov

2026.2.18Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya

DOI: 10.17116/kardio2026190117

tlooto Summary

This study demonstrated shorter hospital-stay and less intraoperative blood loss in the robot-assisted intervention group and less intraoperative blood loss in the robot-assisted intervention group to contribute to lower pain severity and favorable postoperative recovery.

Abstract

Objective. To analyze in-hospital outcomes of robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstructions for steno-occlusive lesions. Material and methods. In 2019—2023, there were 188 aortoiliac reconstructions for steno-occlusive lesions (TASC II C and D lesions). Interventions were performed using standard open technique (47.9%, n=90) or da Vinci Xi surgical system (52.1%, n=98). We evaluated in-hospital outcomes of both techniques. Results. This study demonstrated shorter hospital-stay and less intraoperative blood loss in the robot-assisted intervention group. The incidence of in-hospital complications was higher in open surgery (n=10), and 30% of cases were associated with postoperative wound infection. Less invasive robot-assisted procedures contribute to lower pain severity and favorable postoperative recovery.

Citation format

BAKHISHEV, T., et al. In-hospital results of robot-assisted aorto-iliac reconstructions for occlusive lesions. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya, 2026, 19(1): 7.