K. Sunami, H. Handa, Michiko Ichii, Takayuki Ikezoe, Kazuhito Suzuki, Y. Yamaguchi, Taeko Yonekawa, Akira Endo, H. Nakano, E. Lewis, I. Calleja, Elisabet E. Manasanch, S. Ito, Hitomi Kato
tlooto Summary
BPd showed favorable efficacy compared with PVd, with a manageable safety profile in lenalidomide-exposed Japanese patients with RRMM, and findings were aligned with the global cohort.
Abstract
The phase 3 DREAMM-8 (NCT04484623) trial assessed belantamab mafodotin + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (BPd) vs bortezomib + Pd (PVd) in lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and ≥ 1 prior therapy. Here, we present findings from Japanese patients (data cutoff: 27-May-24). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Overall, 21 patients were randomized 1:1 to BPd (N = 10) and PVd (N = 11). Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range 0.23–26.71). For BPd vs PVd, median PFS was not reached (NR; 95% CI 0.2–NR) vs 14.8 months (95% CI 1.9–NR; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.1–2.8); ORR was 90% (9/10) vs 73% (8/11), including very good partial response or better in 70% (7/10) vs 36% (4/11); median DoR was NR vs 17.5 months. The safety profile was consistent with the global cohort. Ocular adverse events were more common with BPd vs PVd (90% [9/10] vs 9% [1/11]) and a majority were transient and reversible. While the sample size of this study is small, findings were aligned with the global cohort. BPd showed favorable efficacy compared with PVd, with a manageable safety profile in lenalidomide-exposed Japanese patients with RRMM.
Citation format
SUNAMI, K., et al. Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in japanese patients with RRMM in the phase 3 DREAMM-8 trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2026, 123: 686–695.