Early Modern Women WritersLatin American history and cultureLatin American and Latino Studies

Charles Goldhaber

2026.1.10ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE

DOI: 10.1515/agph-2024-0142

Abstract

Abstract I compare a 1689 ballad by the Mexican Hieronymite nun Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, “Let Us Pretend I am Happy,” with David Hume’s 1742 essay, “The Sceptic.” I argue that each composition conveys several competing messages. At the surface layer, both compositions employ skeptical reasoning to argue against the usefulness of learning for attaining happiness. They also invite ironic readings on which learning is a primary source of joy – a point also emphasized by Sor Juana’s defenses of women’s right to study. Ultimately, I argue, both Sor Juana and Hume hold an intermediary position between the surface-layer pessimism and ironic optimism. They express this middle position using a literary device I call ‘layered irony.’ Comparing the two compositions reveals that layered irony is a fitting device for producing the middle position, for critiquing skepticism, and for increasing philosophy’s efficacy in its traditional function as a kind of therapy.

Citation format

GOLDHABER, Charles. Layered irony in sor juana and hume’s compositions on skepticism. ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE, 2026, 0.