Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Potassium Nitrate‐Modified Polycarboxylate Cement at Two Time Points Using Different Adhesive Approaches: An In Vitro Study

ABSTRACT Objectives This in vitro investigation evaluated the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and a modified polycarboxylate cement containing potassium nitrate (PCC/KNO3), both utilized as pulpotomy materials. The performance of two universal adhesives was compared, applied using self‐etch (SE) and etch‐and‐rinse (E&R) strategies. Materials and Methods A total of 192 cylindrical acrylic specimens (2 cm height × 1 cm diameter) with a central cavity (4 mm diameter × 2 mm depth) were fabricated and filled with either MTA or PCC/KNO3 (n = 96 each). These were further divided into eight experimental subgroups (n = 12) based on adhesive type (All‐Bond Universal or Gluma Bond Universal), adhesive application method (SE or E&R), and storage duration (24 h or 7 days). After resin composite application, all specimens were stored in 100% humidity at 37°C for 24 h prior to µSBS testing. Data were analyzed using four‐way ANOVA and independent t‐tests (α = 0.05). Results PCC/KNO3 exhibited significantly greater bond strength than MTA at both 24‐h (p < 0.001) and 7‐day (p = 0.030) intervals. Neither the adhesive type (p = 0.355) nor the application method (p = 0.358) significantly affected bond strength. Over time, µSBS values increased for MTA in some groups, while a significant decline was observed in most PCC/KNO3 subgroups. Conclusion Due to its superior early bond strength and compatibility with immediate restoration, PCC/KNO3 shows potential as a viable alternative to MTA in vital pulp therapy, regardless of the adhesive strategy employed.