Alexander Smith, Matthew L Ortman, John A. Andriulli, Andrea M. Russo
tlooto Summary
This retrospective, observational, single‐center study is to review device implant registry data both before and after the consensus update to determine whether there is an improvement in adherence to consensus‐recommended device programming over time.
Abstract
Despite data‐driven 2015 expert consensus statement (consensus) guidelines on recommended PPM and ICD parameters, patients often fall short of optimal device programing. The purpose of this retrospective, observational, single‐center study is to review device implant registry data both before and after the consensus update to determine whether there is an improvement in adherence to consensus‐recommended device programming over time.
Citation format
SMITH, Alexander, et al. Pacemaker and ICD programming adherence with evidence‐based recommendations. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2026, 37(2): 424–428.