Peer Review at a Crossroads? A Critical Insight into the Scholarly Review Process in Humanities Journals in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Objectives: This study aims to examine the role and status of peer review in academic journals within the humanities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The research focuses on analysing the experiences of journal editors whose publications employ a double-blind or multiple-review process. It explores the impact of peer review on scholarly publishing and academic evaluation, while also identifying key challenges specific to the academic context of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Approach/Methodology: A qualitative research design was employed, combining a review of relevant literature with semi-structured interviews conducted with editors of domestic humanities journals in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Results: The findings indicate that several aspects of the global “peer review crisis” are also evident in the B&H academic publishing landscape. Notable issues include a limited pool of active reviewers, a general reluctance to engage with scholars affiliated with institutions outside the region, and a widespread perception that peer review is insufficiently recognized within systems of academic promotion—factors that may contribute to a lack of motivation among reviewers. Originality/Value: This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the specific challenges faced by the peer review process in Bosnia and Herzegovina and may serve as a basis for rethinking procedures aimed at improving the quality and scope of peer review. It advocates for institutional recognition of peer review as a valuable academic activity. Practical Implications: The findings may assist journal editors in the humanities, as well as university bodies responsible for academic evaluation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in revising criteria for assessing reviewer contributions. Furthermore, they can inform the development of educational programs focused on enhancing peer review practices. Social Significance: Establishing a robust and credible peer review system supports the development of critical thinking, a culture of argumentation, and academic accountability. It also enhances the quality and standing of knowledge production in the field of humanities.