Medicine

Laurentin Duriez, PP Picavet, K. Gommeren

2026.1.26JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE

DOI: 10.1111/vec.70087

tlooto Summary

P and C catheter placement had similar success despite the suggested learning curve for the out-of-plane technique, and a positive slope was identified for the success rate.

Abstract

To compare conventional (C) and point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS)‐guided (P) peripheral catheterization by a single clinician in dogs presenting to the emergency department. The dogs randomly received a peripheral C or P catheter in the cephalic or lateral saphenous vein. The P placement was further randomized to be performed in or out of plane. The success rate, time taken to obtain vascular access, weight, body condition score (BCS), age, shock index (SI), vein catheterized, and technique used were recorded.

Citation format

DURIEZ, Laurentin; PICAVET, PP; GOMMEREN, K. Point‐of‐care ultrasound–guided versus conventional peripheral vascular access in dogs presented to an emergency room. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2026, 36(1): 22–32.