Apiphan Iamchaimongkol, Khanin Leeareekun, Waree Chira-Adisai, Apisara Keesukphan
2026.1.27JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
tlooto Summary
There was no correlation between controlled-pressure provocative test duration and electrodiagnostic severity in patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Abstract
Objective To assess the correlation between controlled-pressure provocative test duration and electrodiagnostic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Design Cross-sectional correlational study. Patients Patients with clinical symptoms consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome were recruited from the electrodiagnosis clinic of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, between September 2023 and July 2024. Methods Patients underwent electrodiagnostic studies, and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome was classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the 2011 criteria of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). Each participant subsequently received a controlled-pressure provocative test. The time to symptom provocation was recorded, with a maximum duration of 30 s. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to assess the association between test duration and electrodiagnostic severity. Results In 124 hands, 31, 45, and 48 hands were categorized by the degree of electrodiagnostic severity as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. There was no correlation (ρ = –0.16, p-value = 0.074) between controlled-pressure provocative test duration and electrodiagnostic severity. Conclusions There was no correlation between controlled-pressure provocative test duration and electrodiagnostic severity in patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Citation format
IAMCHAIMONGKOL, Apiphan, et al. CORRELATION BETWEEN CONTROLLED-PRESSURE PROVOCATIVE TEST DURATION AND ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC SEVERITY IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2026, 58: jrm44203.