Zachary P. Neal, J. Neal
2025.1.1Connections
tlooto Summary
This study describes how it identified and handled potentially problematic responses in the ego network module of the Civic Health and Institutions Project, a 50 States Survey (CHIP50-NET), and excluded 4,282 respondents who named non-agent alters or invalid alters or who provided inconsistent responses.
Abstract
Abstract Data quality issues including problematic responses from non-human bots, malicious respondents, and uncareful respondents can threaten the validity of online survey-based network data. In this study, we describe how we identified and handled potentially problematic responses in the ego network module of the Civic Health and Institutions Project, a 50 States Survey (CHIP50-NET). Specifically, we identified and excluded 4,282 respondents who named non-agent alters or invalid alters or who provided inconsistent responses (17% of the sample). Excluding these potentially problematic respondents from the CHIP50-NET sample had only modest effects on sample demographics. However, these exclusions did yield a prevalence estimate of an uncommon demographic group (adults who do not want children) that was closer to a recent, external benchmark estimate, providing evidence of the validity of our data cleaning efforts. We conclude with implications and recommendations for using the CHIP50-NET dataset specifically, and for cleaning data when conducting large-scale online network surveys more generally.
Citation format
NEAL, Zachary P.; NEAL, J. My closest relationship is with “yur mama”: Data quality in the CHIP50 ego network module. Connections, 2025, 46: 56–65.