LawEnvironmental SciencePolitical Science

Rulemaking in the Shade: An Empirical Study of EPA's Air Toxic Emission Standards

W. Wagner, Katherine Y. Barnes, L. Peters

2011.12.1Administrative Law Review

Abstract

In troduction ............................................................................................... 100 I. Interest Groups and Administrative Law: Background and Problem A reas ................................................................................. 104 A. Interest Group Representation and Administrative A ccountability .......................................................................... 104 B. Rulem aking in the Shade ........................................................ 109 1. Rule Development (the Pre-Notice of Proposed Rulem aking (NPRM ) Period) ............................................ 110 2. After the Rule Is Final (the Post-Final Period) ................... 113 3. The Notice-and-Comment Process in Complex R ulem akings ...................................................................... 116 4. Sum m ary ........................................................................... 118 II. Study D esign ................................................................................... 119 A . Coding the D ocket Index ........................................................ 121 B. Coding the Significant Changes in the Proposed Rule ........... 122

Citation format

WAGNER, W.; BARNES, Katherine Y.; PETERS, L. Rulemaking in the shade: An empirical study of epa's air toxic emission standards. Administrative Law Review, 2011, 63: 99–158.