Open AccessPhilosophyPolitical ScienceComputer Science

Wessel Reijers, Fiachra O’Brolcháin, P. Haynes

2016.12.21Ledger

DOI: 10.5195/ledger.2016.62

tlooto Summary

The extent to which the model of governance offered by blockchain technologies reflect s key governance themes and assumptions located within social contract theories is examined, focusing on the notions of sovereignty, the initial situation, decentralization and distributive justice.

Abstract

This paper is placed in the context of a growing number of social and political crit iq ues of blockchain technologies. We focus on the supposed potential of blockchain technologies to transform political institutions that are central to contemporary human societies, such as money,  property right s regimes , and systems of democratic governance. Our aim is to examine the way blockchain technologies can bring about - and justify - new models of governance . To do so, w e draw on  the philosophical works of Hobbes , Rousseau , and Rawls , analyzing blockchain governance in terms of contrasting  social contract theories .  We begin by comparing the justifications of blockchain governance offered by members of the blockchain developers ’ community with the justifications of governance presented with in social contract theories . We then  examine  the extent to which the model of governance offered by blockchain technologies  reflect s key governance themes and assumptions located within social contract theories , focusing on the notions of sovereignty, the initial situation, decentralization and distributive justice .

Citation format

REIJERS, Wessel; O’BROLCHÁIN, Fiachra; HAYNES, P. Governance in blockchain technologies & social contract theories. Ledger, 2016, 1: 134–151.