Open AccessEconomicsComputer Science

N. Houy

2016.12.21Ledger

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2407834

tlooto Summary

It is shown that miners do not play a Nash equilibrium in the current Bitcoin mining environment, instead, they should not process any transaction, and the situation where no transaction is ever processed would stop being a Nashilibrium if the transaction fee was multiplied.

Abstract

When processing transactions in a block, a miner increases his reward but also decreases his probability to earn any reward because the time needed for his block to reach consensus depends on its size. We show that this leads to a game situation between miners. We analytically solve this game for two miners. Then, we show that miners do not play a Nash equilibrium in the current Bitcoin mining environment, instead, they should not process any transaction. Finally, we show that the situation where no transaction is ever processed would stop being a Nash equilibrium if the transaction fee was multiplied or, equivalently, the fixed reward divided by a factor of about 12.

Citation format

HOUY, N. The bitcoin mining game. Ledger, 2016, 1: 53–68.