Open AccessEconomicsGeography

M. Guadarrama, I. Molina, J. Rao

2016.3.1Statistics in Transition New Series

DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2016-005

tlooto Summary

This 2016 article reviews and compares various small area estimation methods for poverty mapping, focusing on their benefits and drawbacks.

Abstract

Abstract We review main small area estimation methods for the estimation of general non-linear parameters focusing on FGT family of poverty indicators introduced by Foster, Greer and Thorbecke (1984). In particular, we consider direct estimation, the Fay-Herriot area level model (Fay and Herriot, 1979), the method of Elbers, Lanjouw and Lanjouw (2003) used by the World Bank, the empirical Best/Bayes (EB) method of Molina and Rao (2010) and its extension, the Census EB, and finally the hierarchical Bayes proposal of Molina, Nandram and Rao (2014). We put ourselves in the point of view of a practitioner and discuss, as objectively as possible, the benefits and drawbacks of each method, illustrating some of them through simulation studies.

Citation format

GUADARRAMA, M.; MOLINA, I.; RAO, J. A comparison of small area estimation methods for poverty mapping. Statistics in Transition New Series, 2016, 17: 41–66.