Open AccessPhilosophyPsychologyPolitical Science

S. Niemeyer, J. Dryzek

2007.12.1Swiss Political Science Review

DOI: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00087.x

tlooto Summary

Deliberative theory identifies meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes of authentic deliberation, consistent with ideal procedure and empirically tractable.

Abstract

Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.

Citation format

NIEMEYER, S.; DRYZEK, J. The ends of deliberation: Meta‐consensus and inter‐subjective rationality as ideal outcomes. Swiss Political Science Review, 2007, 13: 497–526.