Stephen C. Levinson

2007.3.7Language Teaching

DOI: 10.1017/s0261444807294285

tlooto Summary

The linguistic objects that speakers use in their utterances vastly underdetermine the contributions that those utterances make to discourse.

Abstract

06–411Holmes, Janet (U Wellington, New Zealand; Janet.Holmes@vuw.ac.nz), Leadership talk: How do leaders ‘do mentoring’, and is gender relevant?Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 37.11 (2005), 1779–1800. 06–412Jiang, Xiangying (Northern Arizona U, USA; Xiangying.Jiang@NAU.EDU), Suggestions: What should ESL students know?System (Elsevier) 34.1 (2006), 36–54. 06–413Lewis, Diana M. (Faculté des Langues, Lyon, France; Diana.Lewis@univ-lyon2.fr), Arguing in English and French asynchronous online discussion. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 37.11 (2005), 1801–1818. 06–414Overstreet, Maryann (U Hawai‘i at Manoa, USA; overst@hawaii.edu), And stuff, und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics (Elsevier) 37.11 (2005), 1845–1864. 06–415Ruey-Jiuan, Regina Wu (San Diego State U, USA), Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes (Lawrence Erlbaum) 41.1 (2006), 67–109.

Citation format

LEVINSON, Stephen C. Pragmatics. Language Teaching, 2007, 40: 182–185.