PhilosophyComputer Science
DOI: 10.1007/bf00353453

tlooto Summary

This paper argues for a relative concept of modality underlying modal words like ‘must’ and ‘can’ in natural language and gives preliminary definitions of the meaning of these words which are formulated in terms of logical consequence and compatibility, respectively.

Abstract

Abstract is not available.

Citation format

KRATZER, A. What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 1977, 1: 337–355.