Open AccessComputer ScienceMedicine

Jin-Cheon Na, Wai Yan Min Kyaing

2015.3.1Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice

DOI: 10.1633/jistap.2015.3.1.1

tlooto Summary

This study develops an effective method for sentiment analysis of user-generated content on drug review web sites, which has not been investigated extensively compared to other general domains, such as product reviews.

Abstract

This study develops an effective method for sentiment analysis of user-generated content on drug review web sites, which has not been investigated extensively compared to other general domains, such as product reviews. A clause-level sentiment analysis algorithm is developed since each sentence can contain multiple clauses discussing multiple aspects of a drug. The method adopts a pure linguistic approach of computing the sentiment orientation (positive, negative, or neutral) of a clause from the prior sentiment scores assigned to words, taking into consideration the grammatical relations and semantic annotation (such as disorder terms) of words in the clause. Experiment results with 2,700 clauses show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, and it performed significantly better than the baseline approaches using a machine learning approach. Various challenging issues were identified and discussed through error analysis. The application of the proposed sentiment analysis approach will be useful not only for patients, but also for drug makers and clinicians to obtain valuable summaries of public opinion. Since sentiment analysis is domain specific, domain knowledge in drug reviews is incorporated into the sentiment analysis algorithm to provide more accurate analysis. In particular, MetaMap is used to map various health and medical terms (such as disease and drug names) to semantic types in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Semantic Network.

Citation format

NA, Jin-Cheon; KYAING, Wai Yan Min. Sentiment analysis of user-generated content on drug review websites. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 2015, 3: 6–23.