M. Murad, S. Sultan, S. Haffar, F. Bazerbachi
2018.2.2BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
tlooto Summary
A tool is proposed to evaluate the methodological quality of case reports and case series based on the domains of selection, ascertainment, causality and reporting and signalling questions to aid evidence-based practitioners and systematic reviewers in their assessment.
Abstract
Case reports and case series are uncontrolled study designs known for increased risk of bias but have profoundly influenced the medical literature and continue to advance our knowledge. In this guide, we present a framework for appraisal, synthesis and application of evidence derived from case reports and case series. We propose a tool to evaluate the methodological quality of case reports and case series based on the domains of selection, ascertainment, causality and reporting and provide signalling questions to aid evidence-based practitioners and systematic reviewers in their assessment. We suggest using evidence derived from case reports and case series to inform decision-making when no other higher level of evidence is available.
Citation format
MURAD, M., et al. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 2018, 23: 60–63.