PsychologyMedicine

H. Shaffer, Debi A. LaPlante, R. LaBrie, R. Kidman, Anthony N Donato, Michael V. Stanton

2004.11.1HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY

DOI: 10.1080/10673220490905705

tlooto Summary

The current view of separate addictions is similar to the view espoused during the early days of AIDS diagnosis, when rare diseases were not distinguished between alcohol dependence and pathological gambling.

Abstract

It is common for clinicians, researchers, and public policymakers to describe certain drugs or objects (e.g., games of chance) as “addictive,” tacitly implying that the cause of addiction resides in the properties of drugs or other objects. Conventional wisdom encourages this view by treating different excessive behaviors, such as alcohol dependence and pathological gambling, as distinct disorders. Evidence supporting a broader conceptualization of addiction is emerging. For example, neurobiological research suggests that addictive disorders might not be independent:2 each outwardly unique addiction disorder might be a distinctive expression of the same underlying addiction syndrome. Recent research pertaining to excessive eating, gambling, sexual behaviors, and shopping also suggests that the existing focus on addictive substances does not adequately capture the origin, nature, and processes of addiction. The current view of separate addictions is similar to the view espoused during the early days of AIDS diagnosis, when rare diseases were not

Citation format

SHAFFER, H., et al. Toward a syndrome model of addiction: Multiple expressions, common etiology. HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 12: 367–374.