tlooto
Sign up
LawComputer Science

A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning

H. Prakken, G. Sartor

1996.9.1Artificial Intelligence and Law

DOI: 10.1007/bf00118496

tlooto Summary

This approach complements two other lines of research in AI and Law, investigations of precedent-based reasoning and the development of ‘procedural’, or ‘dialectical’ models of legal argument.

Abstract

Abstract is not available.

Citation format

PRAKKEN, H.; SARTOR, G. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1996, 4: 331–368.