Open AccessPolitical ScienceSociologyComputer Science

Taylor C. Boas, Dino P. Christenson, D. Glick

2018.8.8Political Science Research and Methods

DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.28

tlooto Summary

Examining online recruitment via Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics panels in India and the United States finds online convenience samples often provide valid inferences into how partisanship moderates treatment effects, yet they are typically unrepresentative on political variables, which has implications for the external validity of sample average treatment effects.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines online recruitment via Facebook, Mechanical Turk (MTurk), and Qualtrics panels in India and the United States. It compares over 7300 respondents—1000 or more from each source and country—to nationally representative benchmarks in terms of demographics, political attitudes and knowledge, cooperation, and experimental replication. In the United States, MTurk offers the cheapest and fastest recruitment, Qualtrics is most demographically and politically representative, and Facebook facilitates targeted sampling. The India samples look much less like the population, though Facebook offers broad geographical coverage. We find online convenience samples often provide valid inferences into how partisanship moderates treatment effects. Yet they are typically unrepresentative on such political variables, which has implications for the external validity of sample average treatment effects.

Citation format

BOAS, Taylor C.; CHRISTENSON, Dino P.; GLICK, D. Recruiting large online samples in the United States and india: Facebook, mechanical turk, and qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods, 2018, 8: 232–250.