LawMedicine
DOI: 10.1007/s11017-004-3146-6

tlooto Summary

It is suggested that the Harm Principle provides a more appropriate threshold for state intervention than the Best Interest standard and a series of criteria that can be used in deciding whether the state should intervene in a parent's decision to refuse medical care on behalf of a child.

Abstract

Abstract is not available.

Citation format

DIEKEMA, D. Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2004, 25: 243–264.