Medicine
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540410029013

tlooto Summary

The author noted with interest 3 articles1-3 dealing with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their consequences and concluded that physicians are in a double bind.

Abstract

To the Editor. —I noted with interest 3 articles1-3dealing with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their consequences. Since the hospital to which I admit my patients has started what they describe as a mandatory ADR reporting system, I have 2 points. First, in our institution, trivial events are required to be reported as an ADR. If a cancer patient receiving chemotherapy has nausea or loses his or her hair, that is an ADR; if an asthmatic patient develops mild hyperglycemia from receiving steroids, that is a reportable ADR; if a patient is given antacids for an upset stomach and develops a mild case of selflimited diarrhea, that is a reportable ADR. There seems to be little rational consensus on what constitutes an ADR. The second point is that physicians are in a double bind. If we do not make a selective report to the pharmacy about a

Citation format

DAVIS, P. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 17: 1351;authorreply1353–4.