Photodynamic diagnosis in urology: state of the art.
Janice A Santos Cortes, J. Gahan, M. Soloway
tlooto Summary
This review will focus on the results of a multitude of studies where PDD in combination with various photosensitizers was employed in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer.
Abstract
High grade NMIBC remains a treatment challenge for urologists. WLC is widely regarded as the gold standard for detection and TUR. PDD may offer superiority to WLC in terms of detection, recurrence free survival and overall cost, but the current data must be scrutinized closely. Nearly all trials comparing PDD to WLC have shown an advantage in overall tumor detection with photodynamics and thus may lead to better treatment strategies in these patients. This review will focus on the results of a multitude of studies where PDD in combination with various photosensitizers was employed in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. The equipment, techniques and cost of these modalities will also be discussed.
Citation format
CORTES, Janice A Santos; GAHAN, J.; SOLOWAY, M. Photodynamic diagnosis in urology: State of the art. ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2011, 64 1: 18–31.