Open AccessBiologyComputer ScienceMedicine

K. Mantione, R. Kream, H. Kuželová, R. Ptáček, J. Raboch, Joshua M. Samuel, G. Stefano

2014.8.23Medical Science Monitor Basic Research

DOI: 10.12659/msmbr.892101

tlooto-Zusammenfassung

This review focuses on comparing the two most useful methods for whole transcriptome gene expression profiling in model organisms, and RNA-Seq clearly has a bright future in bioinformatic data collection.

Abstract

Understanding the control of gene expression is critical for our understanding of the relationship between genotype and phenotype. The need for reliable assessment of transcript abundance in biological samples has driven scientists to develop novel technologies such as DNA microarray and RNA-Seq to meet this demand. This review focuses on comparing the two most useful methods for whole transcriptome gene expression profiling. Microarrays are reliable and more cost effective than RNA-Seq for gene expression profiling in model organisms. RNA-Seq will eventually be used more routinely than microarray, but right now the techniques can be complementary to each other. Microarrays will not become obsolete but might be relegated to only a few uses. RNA-Seq clearly has a bright future in bioinformatic data collection.

Zitationsformat

MANTIONE, K., et al. Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: Microarray and RNA-Seq. Medical Science Monitor Basic Research, 2014, 20: 138–141.