Open AccessMedicine

F. Piscaglia, C. Nolsøe, C. Dietrich, D. Cosgrove, O. Gilja, M. B. Nielsen, T. Albrecht, L. Barozzi, M. Bertolotto, O. Catalano, M. Claudon, D. Clevert, J. Correas, M. D’Onofrio, F. Drudi, J. Eyding, M. Giovannini, M. Hocke, A. Ignee, E. Jung, A. Klauser, N. Lassau, E. Leen, G. Mathis, A. Saftoiu, G. Seidel, Paul S. Sidhu, G. T. Haar, D. Timmerman, H. Weskott

2011.8.26ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN

DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281676

tlooto Summary

When chemotherapy is successful, the lesion becomes almost non-enhancing on CEUS with absence of any intra-nodular vessels or microcirculation, seen early, paralleling the PET response.

Abstract

which has been found to be 90% sensitive and 100% specific compared to CT with respect to lesion detection in lymphoma patients [93]. In a retrospective study on splenic metastases, CEUS increased the detection rate by 38% [94]. Lesions found in patients with solid organ or haematological malignancies require whole-body imaging using CT and/or PET [95], but CEUS can be useful if they are inconclusive, particularly to rule out lesions when PET shows “ non-specific uptake ” . Finally, CEUS can be used in patients with splenic malignancies to monitor their response to treatment. When chemotherapy is successful, the lesion becomes almost non-enhancing on CEUS with absence of any intra-nodular vessels or microcirculation. These findings are seen early, paralleling the PET response. Long-term follow-up shows progressive dis-appearance of the lesions.

Citation format

PISCAGLIA, F., et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2011, 33: 33–59.