PhilosophyMedicineMathematics

Federica Russo, Jon Williamson

2007.7.1INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

DOI: 10.1080/02698590701498084

tlooto Summary

It is argued that the health sciences require a theory of causality that unifies its mechanistic and probabilistic aspects, and that the epistemic theory of causal causality provides the required unification.

Abstract

We argue that the health sciences make causal claims on the basis of evidence both of physical mechanisms, and of probabilistic dependencies. Consequently, an analysis of causality solely in terms of physical mechanisms or solely in terms of probabilistic relationships, does not do justice to the causal claims of these sciences. Yet there seems to be a single relation of cause in these sciences—pluralism about causality will not do either. Instead, we maintain, the health sciences require a theory of causality that unifies its mechanistic and probabilistic aspects. We argue that the epistemic theory of causality provides the required unification.

Citation format

RUSSO, Federica; WILLIAMSON, Jon. Interpreting causality in the health sciences. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2007, 21: 157–170.