tlooto
Sign up
MedicineMathematics

A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques

L. Critchley, J. Critchley

1999.1.4JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING

DOI: 10.1023/a:1009982611386

tlooto Summary

Graphically, it was shown that limits of agreement of up to ±30% were acceptable and accepted when using bias and precision statistics, cardiac output, bias, Limits of agreement, and percentage error should be presented.

Abstract

Abstract is not available.

Citation format

CRITCHLEY, L.; CRITCHLEY, J. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1999, 15: 85–91.