Open AccessComputer Science

Stefanie Haustein, Vincent Larivière, Mike Thelwall, Didier Amyot, Isabella Peters

2014.10.2IT-Information Technology

DOI: 10.1515/itit-2014-1048

tlooto Summary

A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley to show in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics.

Abstract

Abstract A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging platform used by a general audience to distribute information, Mendeley is a reference manager targeted at an academic user group to organize scholarly literature. Both platforms are used as sources for so-called “altmetrics” to measure a new kind of research impact. This analysis shows in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics based on a large set of PubMed papers.

Citation format

HAUSTEIN, Stefanie, et al. Tweets vs. mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? [preprint]. arXiv, 2014. arXiv:1410.0569.