Open AccessMedicinePsychologyEngineering

I. Tachtsidis, F. Scholkmann

2016.3.9Neurophotonics

DOI: 10.1117/1.nph.3.3.031405

tlooto Summary

The possible physiological origins of fNIRS hemodynamic responses that are not due to neurovascular coupling are summarized and ways to avoid and remove them are suggested.

Abstract

Abstract. We highlight a significant problem that needs to be considered and addressed when performing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies, namely the possibility of inadvertently measuring fNIRS hemodynamic responses that are not due to neurovascular coupling. These can be misinterpreted as brain activity, i.e., “false positives” (errors caused by wrongly assigning a detected hemodynamic response to functional brain activity), or mask brain activity, i.e., “false negatives” (errors caused by wrongly assigning a not observed hemodynamic response in the presence of functional brain activity). Here, we summarize the possible physiological origins of these issues and suggest ways to avoid and remove them.

Citation format

TACHTSIDIS, I.; SCHOLKMANN, F. False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Issues, challenges, and the way forward. Neurophotonics, 2016, 3.