Open AccessPsychologyEducationSociology

J. B. Kelly, M. Lamb

2005.3.15Family Court Review

DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00577.x

Abstract

Decisionsregardingcustody andaccessaremost oftenmade withoutreferencetotheresearchon child development, although this literature can be useful in conceptualizing children’s needs after separation and divorce. Research on attachment processes, separation from attachment figures, and the roles of mothers and fathers in promoting psychosocial adjustment are reviewed in this article. It concludes with a discussion of the implications for young children’s parenting schedules. Powerful influences shape decisions about custody and access arrangements when parents are separating or divorcing. Regardless of whether parents make their decisions independently or rely on therapists, custody evaluators, or judges for recommendations and decisions, statutory, historical, and cultural forces often determine which care arrangements are deemed to be in the children’s best interests (Kelly, 1994). Unfortunately, however, decision makers in family law and mental health fields remain largely ignorant about several decades of research on child development. Child development researchers and child custody decision makers rarely cross paths, and most of the relevant publications intended for academic audiences are inaccessible to casual readers. In this article, we discuss research that directly helps conceptualize custody and access issues that need to be addressed when parents separate. Because so many questions arise regarding appropriate postseparation arrangements for infants and young children, the focus will be on attachment processes, separation from attachment figures, and the roles of mothers and fathers in promoting children’s development. To facilitate readability, we primarily cite review articles; readers can study the cited articles for references to the primary literature.

Citation format

KELLY, J. B.; LAMB, M. USING CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH TO MAKE APPROPRIATE CUSTODY AND ACCESS DECISIONS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. Family Court Review, 2005, 38: 297–311.