Environmental ScienceComputer Science

Desheng Liu, Fan Xia

2009.12.1Remote Sensing Letters

DOI: 10.1080/01431161003743173

tlooto Summary

The results based on a QuickBird satellite image indicate that segmentation accuracies decrease with increasing segmentation scales and the negative impacts of under-segmentation errors become significantly large at large scales.

Abstract

The advantages of object-based classification over the traditional pixel-based approach are well documented. However, the potential limitations of object-based classification remain less explored. In this letter, we assess the advantages and limitations of an object-based approach to remote sensing image classification relative to a pixel-based approach. We first quantified the negative impacts of under-segmentation errors on the potential accuracy of object-based classification by developing a new segmentation accuracy measure. Then we evaluated the advantages and limitations of object-based classification by quantifying their overall effects relative to pixel-based classification, with respect to their classification units and features at multiple segmentation scales. The results based on a QuickBird satellite image indicate that (1) segmentation accuracies decrease with increasing segmentation scales and the negative impacts of under-segmentation errors become significantly large at large scales and (2) there are both advantages and limitations in using object-based classification, and their trade-off determines the overall effect of object-based classification, which is dependent on the segmentation scales.

Citation format

LIU, Desheng; XIA, Fan. Assessing object-based classification: Advantages and limitations. Remote Sensing Letters, 2009, 1: 187–194.