Open AccessComputer SciencePsychologySociology
Eyal Péer, S. Samat, L. Brandimarte, Alessandro Acquisti
tlooto Summary
CrowdFlower provided the best response rate, but CF participants failed more attention-check questions and did not reproduce known effects replicated on ProA and MTurk, while ProA participants produced data quality that was higher than CF's and comparable to MTurK's.
Abstract
Abstract is not available.
Citation format
PÉER, Eyal, et al. Beyond the turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70: 153–163.