D. Holton, D. Clarke
2006.3.15International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
tlooto Summary
By situating metacognition within a framework derived from the social activity of scaffolding, a bridge is formed between the instructional support a teacher might provide and the learner's self-control of the learning process.
Abstract
This paper proposes an expanded conception of scaffolding with four key elements: i. scaffolding agency – expert, reciprocal, and self-scaffolding; ii. scaffolding domain – conceptual and heuristic scaffolding; iii. the identification of self-scaffolding with metacognition; and iv. the identification of six zones of scaffolding activity; each zone distinguished by the matter under construction and the relative positioning of the participant(s) in the act of scaffolding. These key elements are illustrated with empirical examples drawn from a variety of research studies. Scaffolding, thus conceived, brings together several theoretical domains, and by situating metacognition within a framework derived from the social activity of scaffolding, a bridge is formed between the instructional support a teacher might provide and the learner's self-control of the learning process. With regard to instruction and the role of the teacher, it is the authors’ contention that a major object of instruction is the progressive relocation of scaffolding agency in the direction of the learner with the long-term goal of equipping the learner to take control of their own learning.
Citation format
HOLTON, D.; CLARKE, D. Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2006, 37: 127–143.