T. Kwiatkowski, J. Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur P. Parikh, Chris Alberti, D. Epstein, I. Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc V. Le, Slav Petrov
2019.8.1Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
tlooto Summary
The Natural Questions corpus, a question answering data set, is presented, introducing robust metrics for the purposes of evaluating question answering systems; demonstrating high human upper bounds on these metrics; and establishing baseline results using competitive methods drawn from related literature.
Abstract
We present the Natural Questions corpus, a question answering data set. Questions consist of real anonymized, aggregated queries issued to the Google search engine. An annotator is presented with a question along with a Wikipedia page from the top 5 search results, and annotates a long answer (typically a paragraph) and a short answer (one or more entities) if present on the page, or marks null if no long/short answer is present. The public release consists of 307,373 training examples with single annotations; 7,830 examples with 5-way annotations for development data; and a further 7,842 examples with 5-way annotated sequestered as test data. We present experiments validating quality of the data. We also describe analysis of 25-way annotations on 302 examples, giving insights into human variability on the annotation task. We introduce robust metrics for the purposes of evaluating question answering systems; demonstrate high human upper bounds on these metrics; and establish baseline results using competitive methods drawn from related literature.
Citation format
KWIATKOWSKI, T., et al. Natural questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, 7: 453–466.