C. V. D. van der Vleuten, D. Swanson
tlooto Summary
This article provides a comprehensive review of large‐scale studies of the psychometric characteristics of SP‐based tests and indicates that the major source of measurement error is variation in examinee performance from station to station.
Abstract
A little more than 10 years ago, the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was introduced. It includes several “stations,”; at which examinees perform a variety of clinical tasks. Although an OSCE may involve a range of testing methods, standardized patients (SPs), who are nonphysicians trained to play the role of a patient, are commonly used to assess clinical skills. This article provides a comprehensive review of large‐scale studies of the psychometric characteristics of SP‐based tests. Across studies, reliability analyses consistently indicate that the major source of measurement error is variation in examinee performance from station to station (termed content specificity in the medical‐problem‐solving literature). As a consequence, tests must include large numbers of stations to obtain a stable, reproducible assessment of examinee skills. Disagreements among raters observing examinee performance and differences between SPs playing the same patient role appear to have less effect on the pr...
Citation format
VLEUTEN, C. V. D. van der; SWANSON, D. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: State of the art. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1990, 2: 58–76.