PhilosophyArt

A. Speight

2013.8.23Hegel Bulletin

DOI: 10.1017/hgl.2013.12

tlooto サマリー

Hegel's distinction between artist and artisan is reexamined to consider social changes required for new art forms to emerge.

要旨

This article examines Hegel's use of the distinction between ‘artist’ (Künstler) and ‘artisan’ (Werkmeister) in light of recent discussion about the ‘end’ of art and the distinction betweeen art and craft that, as some have argued, has been central to the concept of the fine arts since the eighteenth century. Hegel does employ an important distinction between artist and artisan, but he does so within a larger account of the continuum of forms of human making that can take into consideration the importance of the artisan's work as well as the artist's. Hegel's account involves two distinctive features not always at issue in the artist/artisan distinction: the stress on the social changes required for new forms of art to emerge and an embrace of the human being as the essentially retrospective and interpretive animal in whom the decisive intersection of content and form finally makes art what it is.

引用形式

SPEIGHT, A. Artisans, artists and hegel's history of art*. Hegel Bulletin, 2013, 34: 203–222.